RSS FeedFacebookSearch
Gary Younge

Crystal clear contender: Lord Foster
Pies in the sky? Thumbs down for Foster design

Lord Foster, the British architect whose design for a building to replace the World Trade Centre was one of the most popular with New Yorkers, has been all but ruled out of the competition.

A team of architects rejected his proposal of two crystalline towers because they felt it would not be practical to construct or find tenants to fill. The architects' recommendation will go to the panel which will make the final decision next week. However, it is still possible that Foster's name will be thrown back into the ring.

The Berlin-based architect Daniel Libeskind and a team in New York led by Rafael Vinoly and Fred Schwartz emerged as the two top choices from board members of the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation, sources told the New York Post.

The Libeskind plan contains a garden-filled tower that rises 1,776ft and designates the seven-acre area within the site's walls for a memorial. The New York team's proposal features a pair of latticework towers built around the footprints of the twin towers.

Given the complex decision-making that surrounds the rebuilding of the site, the decision of the architects is not final and has no legal basis, and some sources say there is still strong support for Foster's design.

Responsibility for the site is divided between the governors of New York and New Jersey, who own the land, and two businessmen who leased the space. But public involvement has played a significant part.

The first six proposals, unveiled in July, were so underwhelming that the LMDC went back to the drawing board. It returned with a far more encouraging shortlist of nine models, which have been on display for several weeks.

The public consultation process has had to balance demands from the victims for a memorial as well as business demands.

The official decision on the final designs is expected to be made next week.

© Gary Younge. All Rights reserved, site built with tlc
Who Are We – And Should It Matter in the 21st Century?
book review
The more power an identity carries, the less likely its carrier is to be aware of it as an identity at all.
 follow on twitter
RT @meghanetinsley: New blog post on @RaceEDS: Our take on the removal of the last Confederate statue on Monument Avenue. @EthnicityUK @gar
RT @DrFrancesRyan: Solidarity with Andrew Neil. We all go into journalism hoping to tackle the metropolitan elite but before you know it, y…
@elotroalex @dbatchak Thanks so much. I found it and really appreciate your help.
RT @BlackYouthProj: The Race & Populism working group is hosting a public dialogue about the role of people of color in building a new mult…
@jakeqmarshall Honoured @jakeqmarshall . Hopefully see you on Monday at this lecture on Black Lives Matter -…
“Black Lives Matter: movement, moment, symbol, substance?”
RT @creativetourist: SATURDAY: Speakers on DAY TWO of the @ROHfestival's 'Weekend to Inspire' include broadcaster Gary Younge and founder o…
RT @fernandezostos: Gary Younge explica la relación de los norteamericanos con las armas y para hacerlo escoge un día al azar, el 23/11/201…
RT @uchicago3ct: We're pleased to be co-sponsoring a virtual event on Race & Populism featuring panelists Gary Younge, Laura Grattan, Tiann…
RT @BARACUK: @garyyounge Greetings. Could you RT please, we're raising funds for legal fees to #helpbruce to reverse his deportation to Zi…
© Gary Younge. All Rights reserved, site built with tlc